MEDB

[aubins]

Comments

[aubins]

Hmm. Depending on the person? Yes. Very much so.

[ if there are crimes then they are a surprise to me too ]

[ LOOKS AT THIS WEEKEND’S TRIAL TIREDLY ]

It’d be nice if our killers could be restrained enough to leave one body this time. [ ha ] I don’t think for a moment they’ll stop killing, but they could wind it back a little.

[fergalicious]

Right.

[ she points straight at him. he’s someone it’d be satisfying without a full surprise. ]

We’re terrible at finding out who it is. I don’t think that’ll encourage people to keep it on the lower body count side.

[aubins]

[ terrifying. ]

We probably overcomplicate things. If we do things more logically, and try and keep our evidence in order maybe things will be easier.

These phone things have a camera option, don't they? I need to remember that I can take images of places I investigate.

[fergalicious]

There is a number of us that come from places without too much technology, so I'm not surprised we all haven't been using them to their most.

[ She can admit she hasn't. ]

If we can be more effective with all the tools we have, that'll help.

[aubins]

... I don't even know what the phones can do other than text and take the odd photo. Could we be messaging someone back in the conference room to tell them what we've found? Means we don't have to wait around for people to get back from investigations.

...

But also means we'd be working off of minimal information until they did.

[fergalicious]

Well, we have no information until people come back.

[ So it's nothing, everything, or bit by bit. ]

[aubins]

... Well, I'd take minimal over nothing. I'm just concerned we could run too wild with theories and then struggle to detach from them if they're proved wrong by other information we find or are told about.


We're very good at hyperfocusing. But not in a good way.