Ask around, make a list and collaborate the information first thing? Or at the very least, some people could stay behind and catch up on any we've missed, while some go and explore places we are sure will have something.
Right, something like that. If we can get everyone to agree at the start of the week that anyone who investigates a room they didn't wake up in on Friday should meet up with each other at a designated place, we can make sure we have those details before we even walk into the conference room, and send someone to go look right away while the rest of us discuss.
Ideally, we should send people who spent the night with at least one other person, so while they're investigating the other person could share the details of what went on there before we fell asleep and when we woke up.
We know the sorts of things we'll be looking for every single week - we can get that out of the way early, and try to stay as focused as possible so we can move on to finding new things.
Right. There's no such thing as a perfect crime. [even with the ones they didn't solve, if the evidence stuck around, they probably could figure it out eventually.] And there's no one who's perfect at keeping secrets, either.
We'll either catch someone at a trial, or after the fact. But they won't get away with it forever.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
[ it's... a thought. ]
no subject
Ideally, we should send people who spent the night with at least one other person, so while they're investigating the other person could share the details of what went on there before we fell asleep and when we woke up.
no subject
So... double up at least, and then we use the numbers in each room to split the work load of curfew effects and visions, and room exploration.
no subject
We know the sorts of things we'll be looking for every single week - we can get that out of the way early, and try to stay as focused as possible so we can move on to finding new things.
no subject
no subject
Yes, let's go with that.
no subject
We've already blown the third time part, might as well adapt.
no subject
no subject
... We can't keep getting it wrong. Just in general, someone will slip up eventually.
no subject
We'll either catch someone at a trial, or after the fact. But they won't get away with it forever.
no subject
[ ... ]
Unfortunately, we might find ourselves improving the more these things happen. [ huff. ] Even if that will mean more death.
no subject
no subject
no subject
I'd like to catch all of them, honestly - it's better to know the truth of what happened and why our friends are dying than to stay in the dark.
...but I absolutely want to catch the people who are likely to kill again.
no subject
I mean. We got the robot on a technicality, but still...
[ ... ]
Yes. Repeat offenders might get more over-confident and make more mistakes too.
no subject
[tamaki wasn't missing a skull... hk-47 doesn't even HAVE a skull...]
...but we will get them. We will.
no subject
Right.
Keep that determination with you.
no subject
I definitely won't let go of it.
no subject
no subject
and this seems like a good place to wrap it becks im crying we're so close to 500 comments on this log]
no subject
no subject
no subject
stop ]